- 50% more shaving surface for a fast, close shave
- Jet Clean System with Active Drying automatically washes away debris and stubble. The razor is dried within hours of cleaning
- Contour Following System follows the contours of the face catching each hair with one stroke
- Precision Cutting System – Ultra thin heads with slots to cut long hairs and holes to shave the shortest stubble
- Super Lift and Cut Technology – Dual blade system lifts hairs to cut comfortably below skin level
Product DescriptionThe new Philips Norelco Speed-XL 8260CC offers 50% more shaving surface for a fast and close shave. The Jet Clean system automatically washes dirt and stubble. The contour following system follows the contours of the face catching each hair with a blow. The Precision Cutting System features ultra thin heads with slots to shave long hairs and holes to shave, shave the shortest stubble. Super Lift & Cut Technology ensures a close with a dual blade system designed to lift hair shave cut comfortably below skin level. . . . More>>
Loading ...
I got Philips Norelco 8260XLCC. The shaver is ligth, noise and crowds faber the Jet Clean system is cumbersome and impractical. I was hoping GET, a small and practical base support. Rating: 5.3
The winner is. . . The Panasonic ES8109S 3-blade – barely. Set the Remington blades and knives (keeping the middle blade of the Panasonic) on a Panasonic shaver min 13 000 rpm, and you would have the world’s best electric shaver. The Remington shave a little closer than the Panasonic and provided a faster shave. However, the difficulty tipped in cleaning, noise and lack of a charging station to me is the Panasonic Auswahl.Dies a review of the final three Panasonic models; ES8243A (4-leaf) ES8109S (3-sheet) and ES7109, the Remington MS2 -390, the Norelco 8260 CC and the Braun Series 5 8995 (8985 & 8975 differ only in displays and cleaning). I have an average beard and have been with electric razor (slides and rotaries) over 30 years. The models here are no better than other higher quality razor I’ve heard. It takes about 10 minutes (no razor will give you a first-pass shave) indicates that a good shave dry (with or without pre-electric gels / oils to obtain) and you must put under pressure to get a close shave. This means charging every 4-5 days. Gels / oils to make easier the process – not faster – and I have six of them on their websites Amazon rezensiert.ES8109S: This three-blade razor is a very close shave, with a little work. It does make a higher pitch whine “,” shaving, that something is annoying, but not what I consider to be loud. Cleaning is also loud. Based on other reviewers, I was expected to sound like a lawnmower, but it is only an occasional hum as it cleans. The “Arc Foil” design slows shaving (see discussion below). ES8243A: I had hoped that the four wings of the Panasonic ES8243A it might be possible to give a superior shave. As it turns out, the big four-blade surface as trying to the end of a 2×4 is to keep on your face. I thought in the areas of cutting, where there is not much more difficult area of skin (chin, jaw line, upper lip, sideburns base, etc.). In fact, I think that the fourth blade actually in the middle are not an intrusion into a better shave and the two middle sheets as good as the primary cutter. makes the “Arc Foil” design is still slower (see discussion below). Another future problem with the 4-blade system is that you want a new shaver when your blades and buy film need to be replaced. What kind of idiot to spend 80% of the cost of a new razor, just to get a new set of cutters and foil? All in all, the ES8243A 4-blade is a bad Wert.ES7109S: The flat design of the film is a better design than the “Arc Foil” (see below). Unfortunately, this shaver has an under-powered engine and the floating head that is not locked können.Panasonic talk: Panasonic Shaver had developed an excellent line of about ten years ago. My old ES8067 still shaves closer than these new “Nano Technology” – a misnomer (marketing gimmick). I think the reason that Panasonic was the older models with cutting blades with each blade with about half the width of cut of all recent Panasonic blades (including spares have been). This means more space on the newer blades and that means less cutting. Remington is the ideal knife (that Panasonic used to make) and it shows in closer cut and less time spent, so. In addition, the new Panasonic “Arc Foil” Razor, the film was going to cover curved away from your face at the ends of the film, further decreasing exposure to the blades and require much more to the same area. Unfortunately, Panasonic is their improved motor (13,000 rpms) just this ill-conceived “Arc Foil” design. Battery time on the Panasonic is the shortest of all shavers reviewed here. The Panasonic trimmers are so narrow, all these models is that you trim to not be able to sideburns with a try. You must re-position you to get the trimmer, which you missed. This increases the probability that an uneven sideburns must erhalten.Die Remington MS2-390, the blades that should have the Panasonic’s (and did years): flat film area (not “Arc Foiled”), good length (25%) and ultra thin blades. As a result of the close shave is better and spent time is shorter. However, this is the loudest (and it is loud) all razors and there are no bells and whistles. With a Pre-Shave Oil / Gel gum up the blades, as with any razor, but those blades pop off with the slightest brush so prepared, they are observed in the sink to try cleaning it. A charging station would increase the comfort of this shaver. Remington has tried a bad job with the Einzelheiten.Der Braun Series 5 8995 (you can hear noticeable slowing of the necessary pressure is applied, like a lawn mower when it reaches a thick grass), but it does not get quite as close as the Remington or Panasonic without a severe burning after shaving. The brown can also leave burn marks, and even sections (nose and lips), that will bleed. Quote: You would think that with him as close as it will actually burn the skin, it would also give a closer shave. I suspect this is a proof that razors can not “lift” to cut hair better. In addition, the design of the handle is inferior, which makes the positioning. It has a much wider trimmer and longer battery life between charges obwohl.Die, Norelco 8260 CC: I have this kind of rotary shavers for many years in the 80s. I switched to film, and found I could get a closer shave. This is still the case. In addition, because the circular blade, it is somewhat difficult to target specific sites for cleanup. However, this is the quietest Rasierer.PS: Do not accept nonsense be set on your face in 30 days, unless you come from a blade to be. If you’re used to an electric shaver, you only need one or two weeks to see the difference. The only thing that is magical about 30 days, that they no longer return it for a refund – what a coincidence! Rating: 5.3
Nice razor burn shave shave free of charge to the face and neck, but not so close to one on the head. Overall not a bad shaver. Rating: 5.3
Do not even bother to waste your time and money on this knife WASTE! Arcitec or for that matter!, use the Philips Norelco 734XL, which shaved more than 8260CC Arcitec or! The 7340XL is on sale at Walmart for $ [. . . ]. Please read my review of the 7340XL. Do you have any questions, please contact me at doghousesipper8 @ yahoo. com good shave-Michael Rating: 5.2
The razor shaves great, just like my previous Norelco’s – no problem with his Hauptmission.Doch after only two months of use, the on-off switch, and I can not turn it on. Norelco customer service was very polite, and will replace it for me – in 7-14 days – that is what I shall in the meantime tun.Interessant, is the reason why I bought this shaver because my previous Norelco, only a few months from the warranty, so no support from Norelco failed – - ON / OFF switch failed and it could not werden.Irgend turned something is not right in Denmark. Rating: 5.1